-

 As some generalize something about the society and life too much, they are often asked if they've had any, if not enough, experiences about it and their potential righteousness are suppressed. However, most of the time, we have our experiences through the others' lives.

Yorumlar

Yorum Gönder

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Eray's Wager

-
Resim
 This schema is an explanation for this syntice where I argue that acting with the expectation of worst-case scenario is much more practical, especially in a technical context, than the other way around. I shamelessly call it "Eray's Wager", which is a blatant reference to Pascal's Wager . Here is the schema: The Schema of Eray's Wager Explanation Assuming we are in a context that we need to conduct a process that has at least a little societal side effect. In this case: Assume that we conducted the process as if it will result in the worst case and it resulted so . This means we were right all along. We are also prepared for the current consequences of the process and also prepared for the future consequences since we have gained experience and analyzed the patterns during the process. Assume that we conducted the process as if it will result in the worst case again and it did not . This means we were wrong , but also we are happy at the moment of the c
Devamı
-
 Turkey, being geographically close to the historical origin of the oldest documented trial of democracy, the Ancient Greece , has been failing to apply democracy for almost a hundred years now. So, one might think the problem is about Turkey itself while it is actually super not . The initial implementors of the democapital hybrid, the Western world, has played this hybrid social contract quite great on the so-called developing countries . You can take a closer look at where they bring democracy along with some guns although I cannot really blame them since this is how the game rolls anyway. Some call it "The game is rigged from the very start.". The game is not rigged, its fabric is the rig itself.
Devamı
-
Everyone loses in love for someone else. What matters is the quantity. When you love another person, you lose to both monetary inflation and the inflation of expectations, which is the worst and the most expensive of all. On the other hand, when you love another animal, you lose to only monetary inflation and what you get is the rawest and the most hones love you can ever imagine.
Devamı